The advert is read first
A floor supervisor post: two years supervising, comfortable on the till and the cash-ups, Thursday to Sunday evenings, and a safe way home after a late shift.
You decide who to call.
Nobody is rejected by a machine. The agent reads every application against your advert as you wrote it, and puts the reason next to each name. Where a CV does not say, it asks one question instead of ruling somebody out.
Play the example on our sample CVs
Six applications for a restaurant floor supervisor, ranked against the advert that was posted. It plays in about fifteen seconds.
This is a recorded example on our own sample. To put your own material through the agent, use the live run on the demos page.
Book 30 minutes with us. We run it on your own documents, screen shared, and the call is free.
Everything above runs in your browser on documents we made up. It takes no file of yours. Book the thirty minutes and we run the same thing on your own files while you watch.
The demo above runs on a floor supervisor advert and six applications as they arrived. Press play and read the ranking.
Then run it on your own. Three fields open the real run, and this one works on text: paste your advert, then paste the applications under it.
Use a role you closed last year if you would rather not put live applicants through it. Nothing to hand? One click loads our sample advert and CVs.
Your advert, as written. Not a role description we invent. The one you posted, including the phrasing you did not think twice about, because "must be able to run the floor when I am not there" is a real requirement and it is where generic filters fail.
The applications. PDFs, Word files, CVs pasted into an email, the two page and the eleven page. Photos of a printed CV read too.
Worth two minutes: say which requirements are must-haves and which are nice to have, if the advert blurred them. That changes the ranking more than anything else you can give it.
| Column | What it gives you |
|---|---|
| Verdict | Call, ask one question, or out |
| Name and contact | Taken off the CV |
| Meets | The requirements the CV evidences |
| Gap | What is missing, named specifically |
| Evidence | The line the judgement came from, so you can check it |
| Location | Where they are, because the commute ends placements |
| Availability | Notice period where stated |
The evidence is what makes it usable. A ranking you cannot audit is an opinion from a machine.
A floor supervisor post: two years supervising, comfortable on the till and the cash-ups, Thursday to Sunday evenings, and a safe way home after a late shift.
Each one against that advert, not against a template.
Two to call, two to ask one question, two out.
Nine years on the floor and never a word about a till is one question, not a rejection. The applicant who states weekday daytime only is out on the post as written.
It helps with the first pass. Reading ninety applications fairly is beyond anyone at the end of a working day, and the late ones get read worse than the early ones. A consistent first pass fixes that.
It does not decide. Hiring is a judgement about a person and there is no version of this where you skip the call.
Every verdict carries the line it came from, so you can disagree with it and see exactly where it went wrong.
These are other people's details, so it is worth knowing exactly where they go.
What you paste goes to our server and straight to the model that reads it. It is not written to disk, so there is no copy on our side to delete. The result sits in your browser tab and goes when you close it.
Your name, email and business go to our CRM, because that is how we come back to you. Ask us to delete them and it is done the same day, with confirmation in writing.
A closed role from last year tests it just as well and involves nobody's live application.
| What | Cost |
|---|---|
| The first conversation: one call, our homework, a written solution and a price | No charge |
| An agent with one source and simple rules | R990 a month per agent |
| Most agents: applications from several places, your own criteria | R2,490 a month per agent |
| Complex scope: several systems written into, many exceptions settled | R4,990 a month per agent |
| Minimum term, which covers the implementation | 3 to 6 months |
What moves the tier: where applications arrive from, whether the shortlist has to land in a hiring system, and how much of your sifting is particular to you rather than obvious. Keeping the criteria current as roles change is covered. The number is in the proposal before anything starts.
The numbers, in one place
It is a first pass, ordered by criteria you wrote, with the reasoning next to every name. The alternative is a tired person skimming ninety files after supper. Everyone in the top group is then read properly by you.
Applicant CVs are personal information and you are the responsible party. In the demo nothing is written to disk. In a build, retention and who can see what are part of the design, and we will not hand you something that quietly keeps CVs forever.
Usually yes. Photos and scans are common in this pile, so they are part of what it is built to handle.
Yes, and you should. Re-ranking after you sharpen the must-haves is where the list gets useful, and it takes seconds rather than another evening.
The next step
Then leave a number and a good time to call, and we come back with what it takes to run your next role through it.